Rita lynn alboher ssa12/27/2023 ![]() But the answer isn’t to shut ourselves down. I understand the hesitation to share views at the risk of being canceled, called out (or sued!). When anyone feels unsafe to share input, we all lose. At a recent focus group we held with leaders between the ages of 17 and 30, one participant said younger leaders, like older ones, are afraid of being canceled for saying the “wrong thing.” They want opportunities to mentor and be mentored by others, both older and younger than themselves. These younger leaders are committed to working across generations. Right now we’re working with a group of 32 leaders under 30 to better understand what they want from older allies in the struggle for social change. He closes his piece by asking “What’s the solution?” and inviting conversation.Īt CoGenerate (Formerly ), we work to bridge generational divides, uniting older and younger people to solve the problems no generation can solve alone. He wrote that senior nonprofit leaders are treading so carefully amid younger employees’ demands that the entire sector is in crisis, with older leaders essentially muzzling themselves and younger leaders failing to receive the mentoring they deserve. As he put it: “entoring is the great unspoken casualty of the nonprofit upheaval era, in which relatively new employees feel it’s their right to question virtually every aspect of what their employers do and how they do it.” ![]() Last week in the The Chronicle of Philanthropy Eboo Patel sounded an alarm about generational tension in the nonprofit sector. How Pew Research Center will report on generations moving forward When we see that younger adults have different views than their older counterparts, it may be driven by their demographic traits rather than the fact that they belong to a particular generation. We know that the United States has become more racially and ethnically diverse in recent decades, and that race and ethnicity are linked with certain key social and political views. ++ Changing demographics also may play a role in patterns that might at first seem like generational differences. People could also be grouped relative to their age during key historical events (such as the Great Recession or the COVID-19 pandemic) or technological innovations (like the invention of the iPhone). This would create narrower cohorts in which the members may share more in common. For example, some observers have suggested grouping people by the decade in which they were born. ++ While generational labels are simple and catchy, there are other ways to analyze age cohorts. These points especially resonated with me: When people ask me about generational differences, I suggest we clarify what we mean - Are we talking about age, life stage, generation or perhaps a mix of those things? And I then wonder - what other kinds of differences are at play that have nothing to do with age/life stage/generation but relate to economics, education level, where we live, or other facets of our identity? And it's so thoughtful! So much that we read relating to generations is anchored in stereotypes and descriptions that oversimplify large swaths of our population (and that don't take into account the many demographic factors that are at play aside from our birth years). ![]() This is huge news - Pew Research Center, the leading source for information relating to generational trends - is reevaluating how they research and report on age and generational issues.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |